Comments on: Aggregation versus content theft

By: content theft - StartTags.com

content theft - StartTags.com — Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:18:20 +0000

[...] stolen from http://www.agentgenius.com as we take the theft of our content very seriously. …Aggregation versus content theft | TheSocialNetworkerAggregation versus content theft. Written on November 23, 2009 by Chris Miller in Totally Random. 3 [...]

By: sandyxxx

sandyxxx — Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:15:47 +0000

I've never even thought about commenting till now. I guess if I really like a post I find myself checking the external links for

more and favoriting (if that is a word) the post instead.
From now on though I'll definitely try and drop a comment every so often.

hot deal--

By: Julian Robichaux

Julian Robichaux — Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:39:07 +0000

There's a site that comes up sometimes with local Atlanta news that has appears to be made up entirely of aggregated/plagiarized material: www . communityradar . com (extra spaces added so you won't inadvertently link to the site and raise its ranking. Always makes me kind of mad when I see it.

On the one hand, they have links back to the sites they steal content from. On the other hand, I'd be very surprised if all of those sites have expressly given permission to have their content reused that way — word-for-word and sometimes even picture-for-picture republication. Some of the information is from local tv or radio new sites, and I know they have pretty strict and obvious reuse policies.

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:18:47 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by lgshareditems: Aggregation versus content theft http://j.mp/5G8otZ...